TheDarkRealm
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.



 
HomeHome  Main PageMain Page  Latest imagesLatest images  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Latest topics
» Random Thoughts
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby endless dark Fri Oct 01, 2021 7:02 am

» Your Favourite TV Shows/Programs
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby SneakyST Tue Oct 23, 2018 11:59 am

» Things you want to learn!
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby SneakyST Tue Oct 23, 2018 11:52 am

» Things You Must Have
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby SneakyST Fri Sep 07, 2018 4:26 am

» I feel Happy
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby endless dark Thu Apr 26, 2018 8:58 pm

» The General Rant/Bitch/Moan Thread.
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby Ginger_Snaps Wed Apr 25, 2018 8:43 pm

» Bizarre News
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby endless dark Tue Jan 02, 2018 11:10 pm

» What is everyone doing at the mo?
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby Ginger_Snaps Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:08 am

» Post Random Pictures of yourself!
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby Vampira132 Mon Nov 27, 2017 6:26 pm

» What Are You Listening To Now?
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby Vampira132 Mon Nov 27, 2017 6:15 pm

» The Official Birthday thread!
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby GhostRed Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:14 pm

» Recent Acquisitions Thread
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby Vampira132 Wed Nov 22, 2017 12:17 am

» What Are You Currently Watching?
God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeby ravengrim Sun Nov 19, 2017 10:17 pm

Like/Tweet/+1
Most Viewed Topics
Recent Acquisitions Thread
What should NsanelilMunky go to college for?
Random Thoughts
The General Rant/Bitch/Moan Thread.
What is everyone doing at the mo?
Things You Must Have
The General Rant/Bitch/Moan Thread.
I feel Happy
The funny pages
The General Rant/Bitch/Moan Thread.
Similar topics

 

 God is not the Creator, claims academic

Go down 
5 posters
AuthorMessage
ravengrim
Moderator
ravengrim


Virgo Rat
Number of posts : 7192
Age : 51
Location : At The End Of Time
: : The Fallen Angel
: : God is not the Creator, claims academic Evil10
More Numbers : 7687256
Registration date : 2008-07-21

God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeTue Oct 13, 2009 10:24 pm

God is not the Creator, claims academic

Professor Ellen van Wolde, a respected Old Testament scholar and author, claims the first sentence of Genesis "in the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth" is not a true translation of the Hebrew.

She claims she has carried out fresh textual analysis that suggests the writers of the great book never intended to suggest that God created the world -- and in fact the Earth was already there when he created humans and animals
Prof Van Wolde, 54, who will present a thesis on the subject at Radboud University in The Netherlands where she studies, said she had re-analysed the original Hebrew text and placed it in the context of the Bible as a whole, and in the context of other creation stories from ancient Mesopotamia.

She said she eventually concluded the Hebrew verb "bara", which is used in the first sentence of the book of Genesis, does not mean "to create" but to "spatially separate".

The first sentence should now read "in the beginning God separated the Heaven and the Earth"

According to Judeo-Christian tradition, God created the Earth out of nothing.

Prof Van Wolde, who once worked with the Italian academic and novelist Umberto Eco, said her new analysis showed that the beginning of the Bible was not the beginning of time, but the beginning of a narration.

She said: "It meant to say that God did create humans and animals, but not the Earth itself."

She writes in her thesis that the new translation fits in with ancient texts.

According to them there used to be an enormous body of water in which monsters were living, covered in darkness, she said.

She said technically "bara" does mean "create" but added: "Something was wrong with the verb.

"God was the subject (God created), followed by two or more objects. Why did God not create just one thing or animal, but always more?"

She concluded that God did not create, he separated: the Earth from the Heaven, the land from the sea, the sea monsters from the birds and the swarming at the ground.

"There was already water," she said.

"There were sea monsters. God did create some things, but not the Heaven and Earth. The usual idea of creating-out-of-nothing, creatio ex nihilo, is a big misunderstanding."

God came later and made the earth livable, separating the
and made the earth livable, separating the water from the land and brought light into the darkness.

She said she hoped that her conclusions would spark "a robust debate", since her finds are not only new, but would also touch the hearts of many religious people.

She said: "Maybe I am even hurting myself. I consider myself to be religious and the Creator used to be very special, as a notion of trust. I want to keep that trust."

A spokesman for the Radboud University said: "The new interpretation is a complete shake up of the story of the Creation as we know it."

Prof Van Wolde added: "The traditional view of God the Creator is untenable now."


Quite a sharp turn form the usual Judeo Chrisitan vision of the beginning of the world.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: Re: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeTue Oct 13, 2009 10:30 pm

Just more proof that Christianity/Judeo whatever actually came from a polytheistic start. The Creator is almost always a goddess or the mother. Having a masculine filling that spot is just wrong.
Back to top Go down
Ginger_Snaps
Moderator
Ginger_Snaps


Leo Cat
Number of posts : 4545
Age : 36
Location : The Otherworld
: : Werewolf
: : God is not the Creator, claims academic Bjevig
More Numbers : 7584902
Registration date : 2008-07-22

God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: Re: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeTue Oct 13, 2009 11:09 pm

It's just a woman. What does she know. [/sarcasm]

The theistic Satanists believe that Lucifer was the original creator god that was usurped by Yahweh because he wasn't brutal enough.
Back to top Go down
http://www.freewebs.com/madammarieshorrordollz/
Guest
Guest




God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: Re: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeWed Oct 14, 2009 8:23 am

Well, that does actually fit in with the poly to monotheistic look. One god/goddess overtook all the rest to become the one and only. I know when Northern Europe was converted, all the old gods/goddesses were either demonetised or forgotten. For the Judeo one, I think it was on history channel or national geographic, put apparently there was evidence that Lilith was once a Goddess instead the Demoness mother that killed newborns and pregnant women.
Back to top Go down
RedAngel
star member
RedAngel


Leo Snake
Number of posts : 5385
Age : 46
Location : CT/NC: Josephine on my mind
: : God is not the Creator, claims academic 25883sk
More Numbers : 7413837
Registration date : 2008-11-30

God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: Re: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeWed Oct 14, 2009 10:14 am

Wow, that article is really interesting. It's good to see a close examination of religious text instead of generations of misunderstood/misrepresented writings.

And I wish I caught that History Channel/ NG special Nsane was referring to re: Lilith. I can look it up, I know. I really enjoy having a fresh look at those old texts, and examining the reasons why their meanings have been twisted for so many years.
Back to top Go down
http://gracestudios.deviantart.com/
Guest
Guest




God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: Re: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeWed Oct 14, 2009 2:14 pm

RedAngel wrote:
And I wish I caught that History Channel/ NG special Nsane was referring to re: Lilith. I can look it up, I know. I really enjoy having a fresh look at those old texts, and examining the reasons why their meanings have been twisted for so many years.

It was on a special about Angels and Demons... And while I can't remember what Goddess they said she was or was about, from my own personal reading of one translation of the Epic of Gilgamesh, the character Lilith (as is in Jewish) reminds me of Ishtar. But this is my own personal opinion coming from only one translation. And that one translation is all my knowledge of Babylonian Mythology.
Back to top Go down
endless dark
admin
endless dark


Sagittarius Monkey
Number of posts : 6473
Age : 43
Location : Roc. NY
: : Fearless Leader
: : God is not the Creator, claims academic Egbrlw
More Numbers : 7681885
Registration date : 2008-07-21

God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: Re: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeWed Oct 14, 2009 6:49 pm

ravengrim wrote:

Quite a sharp turn form the usual Judeo Chrisitan vision of the beginning of the world.
Not really.

There are a few things that have to be looked in detail.

ravengrim wrote:
She said she eventually concluded the Hebrew verb "bara", which is used in the first sentence of the book of Genesis, does not mean "to create" but to "spatially separate".

The first sentence should now read "in the beginning God separated the Heaven and the Earth"


This says that he did create it because when something of such complexity is separated something new is created. the water and land were one thing much like they are now under the water but when they are separated that creates two separate things, dry land and a void where there was ocean. Basicly a new creation.

Now, heres the big one. back in the days of "the court" there were two types of english, there was the english the rich spoke and the english that the poor spoke. This is only relevent because when these texts were translated it was done in court (rich) english and in this version of english the "heavens" is not a magical place where no one can see. In all actuallity the old fashioned cartoons where they show the dead on clouds is more correct because "heaven" is the sky. The moon and sun and stars and the clouds are all in the heavens because you look up to see it so then thats where the richeous would go and in deed where God and all the "heavenly angels" lived...

So, to take the original meaning of the court translated english on "heaven" and this lady's theory on seperation then "God" separated the earth from the sky but that brings an interesting problem. How do you separate something like the earth from something like the sky without first creating a space for them both, it would have to be a huge hat trick where the sky was there (the hat) leaving a gap of nothing where the earth was pulled from and now fills the void. There again you have another creation because something is now where nothing was so then god "the separater of the stuff" just created the heaven and earth or if you preffer the separation of the two. Then goes forth to separate man and first woman from the earth and then slightly later mans rib from man to create woman (#2) and even goes and separates light from dark which as I've pointed out are all creations as they are something that are now exsisting but were not then.

this follows for everything that was supposedly "separated", it all makes something new.

As for the creation of animals, where could they have lived before the sky and earth and water were all separated? There again we find some creations either directly by "his will" or indirectly as these things were separated from one another.

Also, you could call god, god the separator, god the creator or even God the destroyer because they all mean the same thing. When somethings separated something new is created but the thing that was created from by the separation was destroyed.

so theres the long and detailed explination of why I say, "not really"
Back to top Go down
http://www.darkrealm13.com
Ginger_Snaps
Moderator
Ginger_Snaps


Leo Cat
Number of posts : 4545
Age : 36
Location : The Otherworld
: : Werewolf
: : God is not the Creator, claims academic Bjevig
More Numbers : 7584902
Registration date : 2008-07-22

God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: Re: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeThu Oct 15, 2009 3:11 am

nsanelilmunky wrote:
RedAngel wrote:
And I wish I caught that History Channel/ NG special Nsane was referring to re: Lilith. I can look it up, I know. I really enjoy having a fresh look at those old texts, and examining the reasons why their meanings have been twisted for so many years.

It was on a special about Angels and Demons... And while I can't remember what Goddess they said she was or was about, from my own personal reading of one translation of the Epic of Gilgamesh, the character Lilith (as is in Jewish) reminds me of Ishtar. But this is my own personal opinion coming from only one translation. And that one translation is all my knowledge of Babylonian Mythology.

I think Lilith was originally Sumerian (a lot of the Jewish stories were borrowed from Sumerian myths). Lilith was added in (not in the Torah) because in the Genesis account there is wording that implies that a woman was originally created along with Adam, so they borrowed Lilith. Here is a little bit more info.
Back to top Go down
http://www.freewebs.com/madammarieshorrordollz/
Guest
Guest




God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: Re: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeThu Oct 15, 2009 8:22 am

^^Eh... same area. I'm really not sure which one Epic of Gilgamesh is from come to think of it...
Back to top Go down
Spooky
vip member
Spooky


Scorpio Rooster
Number of posts : 1421
Age : 42
Location : Exit 11: New Jersey
: : God is not the Creator, claims academic 6tpz4k
More Numbers : 7574736
Registration date : 2008-07-28

God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: Re: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitimeThu Oct 15, 2009 12:07 pm

Well the whole Genesis story is wrought with mistakes, I'm not sure how anyone could just blindly read through the beginning of the book and still take the rest of it seriously.

On the First day God created light and had it divide from darkness. Named it "day" and "night"; but how could anyone know that since HE was the only thing around?

On the Second day: God creates a firmament dividing the waters above from the waters below (huh). The firmament is named "skies"; which poses the same naming issue.

On the Third day God commands the waters below to gather in one place, and dry land appears. "Earth" and "sea" are named (same problem again), and God commands the grass, plants, and fruit-trees to grow.

Fourth day God creates lights in the firmament: Sun and Moon, and all the little stars.

On that crazy fifth day God creates birds and sea creatures, and wants them to "be fruitful".

Day six God creates all the wild beasts, livestock and reptiles. He then creates Man and Woman, and it stated that they will be in "our image and likeness". But if there's only one true god, who is this "our" God's talking about? Oh never mind that, these magic people are supposed to "be fruitful, multiply, fill the earth, and subdue it."

Day seven God, rests from His work, because an all-powerful omnipotent thing which existed before existence, needs to relax after a 6 day work week, he's not a migrant for Christ's sake.


Now aside from the vain notion that the ancient Hebrews knew what God wanted to name everything, and that glaring mistake about God being "one of a group", we have ourselves a chronological order here. Sure most of these exact phrases are written word for word in the Book of the Dead and Sumerian mythologies, but forget about those civilizations who came first and told these stories 1000 years before the Hebrews crawled their way up from the head of the Nile in southern Africa to it's delta.


The Old Testament then describes the magical creation of Adam and Eve. Where before any plants had grown or any rain ever watered the earth, Yahweh formed the man out of dust from the ground and breathed the breath of life into his nostrils, which is nearly word for word the tale of Re creating Atum. Adam....Atum....Adam....Atum.... nothing similar about those names, beside Atum was a hermaphrodite, and that would be silly.

Re, I mean Yahweh, I mean God created a paradise where there was a Tree Of Life and a Tree Of Knowledge that the man is supposed to tend to. This paradise has links to all the major rivers of the Fertile Crescent, except the Nile, that one is not mentioned at all.... anyway. So this man tarries in the garden for years, but the man Adam is lonely, so God makes all the creatures to keep him company and help him work. Those that fly, that crawl, that walk on hooves; Adam names these animals too, and more years go by.

Adam is still lonely though, so God makes man fall asleep, takes a rib from him and makes Eve. Because God couldn't just create another human out of dust, the woman had to belong to the man, anyway. This creation of a mate from the bones of another is in the Epic of Gilgamesh and the creation stories of Enûma from the Assyrian empire. But all that doesn't matter, those are tales of mythology, not history.

What matters is the Holy order of creation is respected and....and....

...wait, God made all the animals first, then made Man and Woman on the same day in the Genesis creation tale. But on the following page of the Bible, God made Adam, then the animals, then Eve.

Well now I'm all confused, were there two different pairs of "first" humans? Was that first woman Lilith, who after Set a talking snake convinced Eve to defy God, tried to steal Adam away from his wife? After Cain killed Abel, was the mysterious couple God created before Adam and Eve the "people Cain encountered while walking West". Is Lilith the "night demon" from Mesopotamia, the "First wife of Adam" according to Hebrew folklore, or did she bare Cain "demon children" according to the Qur'an. Where did all the rest of the people come from if Adam and Eve only had sons, was someone a hermaphrodite, able to be both and both impregnate and get pregnant?


I'm all confused about which unquestionable truth of all things is correct, and which unquestionable holy truths are not correct.
Back to top Go down
http://www.fetishfactory.com
Sponsored content





God is not the Creator, claims academic Empty
PostSubject: Re: God is not the Creator, claims academic   God is not the Creator, claims academic I_icon_minitime

Back to top Go down
 
God is not the Creator, claims academic
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» The Vatican claims Darwin's theory of evolution is compatible with Christianity
» Man claims to have had no food or drink for 70 years
» Bishop claims education is the enemy of the Roman Catholic Church

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
TheDarkRealm :: the threads :: Religion & Philosophy-
Jump to: